Scholarly Book Reviewing as Public Intellectualism

A large part of the duty of journal editors is finding good book reviewers—something that is more difficult than it may seem. Too often book reviews are either disdained as lowly forms of publication or thought of as something that we do in between other projects. Nothing is further from the truth. Writing book reviews is both a service to the scholarly community and a form of public intellectualism. Persons in all stages of their careers need to make a serious commitment to reviewing books: graduate students as an entry into academic publishing and as a way of engaging materials useful for their dissertations; new professors as a way of establishing their professorial signature; and established professors as a way of linking older generations of scholarship with emerging ones. Such commitments are all the more important given the MLA's recent public support of reviewing.

Jeffrey R. Di Leo

CURRENT NEWS

14.05.08
Best Practices for Online Journal Editors
19.10.07
Advertise in the TLS
07.01.07
The 2007 CELJ Awards Competition
01.25.07
CELJ Prizes for 2006
12.17.06
MLA Sessions/Business Meeting
12.9.06
Invitation to Aspiring Creative Writers: "Chat with an Editor" at MLA
12.9.06
Invitation to Aspiring Scholars: "Chat with an Editor" at MLA
12.2.06
Call for Scholarly "Chat" Advisors
12.2.06
Call for Bellestristic "Chat" Advisors
12.1.06
MLA Journal Exhibit
6.2.06
The 2006 CELJ Awards Competition
5.1.06
2005 Award Winners
12.25.05
Final MLA Reminders
11.25.05
Chat with an Editor, MLA 2005: Call for Advisees
11.25.05
CELJ Journal Exhibit, MLA 2005
11.20.05
Chat with Editor, MLA 2005: Call for Advisors
2.15.05
Results of E-bundling Survey